More Than a Tempest in a Tea Pot!

Starring Sam Waterston and Jessie Tyler Ferguson
Starring Sam Waterston and Jessie Tyler Ferguson

The Public Theater presents

The Tempest

 at the Delacorte Theater in Central Park

(near 79th and Central Park West).

Performances run until July 5 at 8pm

Now in Previews

Running Time: 2hrs and 45 minutes with one fifteen minute intermission

Viewed on May 30, 2015

The Public Theater, as part of its Shakespeare in the Park series is featuring The Tempest starring Sam Waterston as Prospero, Jesse Tyler Ferguson as Trinculo, Francesca Carpanini as Miranda, Louis Cancelmi as Caliban, and Chris Perfetti as Ariel.  The Tempest is directed by Michael Greif. The scenic design is by Riccardo Hernandez, and the sound design is by Acme Sound Partners and Jason Crystal.  The Tempest is thought to be Shakespeare’s last play.  Joseph Papp, the founder of The Public Theater envisioned that the public would have free access to theater.  As a result, the Shakespeare in the Park series was born.  Each summer, two plays are featured at The Delacorte Theater. Typically both plays are Shakespearean.  At the end of the summer, The Public Theater has a Public Works program in which people from the five boroughs participate in a Shakespearean play, also at The Delacorte.  After having seen many Shakespearean performances over many years, I look forward to getting in line at 5:30am outside of Central Park, and being ushered into the park at 6am and waiting for six hours to receive the free tickets. The experience is usually pleasant and it’s an opportunity to meet like-minded individuals. I have only not received a ticket once since starting this annual ritual in 1987.  This play uses props, sound and minimal set design to convey the greatest tempest, ushering the audience into an intriguing narrative.

The Delacorte Theater
The Delacorte Theater

The Tempest is about a magically induced storm that hits a ship carrying Trinculo, Antonio, Alonzo, and others.  The tempest, however, was all orchestrated by Prospero, the former Duke of Milan.  Prospero, the protagonist, and his daughter, Miranda, have been on an island for twelve years. While on the island, Prospero begins to tell his daughter that when he was the Duke, his brother, Antonio, usurped his position.  He and his daughter have survived on the island because of materials left on the island. Both Prospero and Miranda were abducted by his brother and by Alonzo, the king of Naples and were placed on the island. Prospero has magical powers garnered from what was left on the island.  It is with these magical powers that Prospero manages to get even with his brother and with Alonzo, allowing him to create a plot with Ariel that helps restore him and Miranda to their rightful positions.

A great play allows the audience to be either riveted or captivated by the various elements of the entire theatrical experience. The Tempest is such a play. The most creative elements of the play are the scenic design, the props, and the sound design that allow the audience to experience the tempest along with the cast. In the opening scene and in other acts of this play, I felt as if i were in the tempest.  The lightning and thunder crackled as if they were real. The sound had precision and caused fear within the cast on stage and within the audience. There was a musician placed stage right, slightly in view, that played gentle and intense notes of classical music periodically during the performance. The music was subtle at times, but seemingly all at the right moments to depict some of the tension within the narrative. Props were used to maximum effect; there were huge swaths of material, similar to flags, that the actors held and swayed to mimic fierce wind.  The costumes also portrayed intense weather.  The actors wore rain coats that were previously wet to portray an intense storm.  The backdrop for the set was that of an ocean and many of the props were related to life at sea or at the shore.

The acting of several of the characters was both engaging and creative.  Caliban, the antagonist, malevolently played by Louis Cancelmi, gives us more than a glimpse into the underworld. He has been Propero’s slave while on the island. Calcelmi’s acting gives us insight into his vindictiveness against Prospero.  The costume that he wore was both dingy and dirty. It accurately depicted the underworld.  Ariel, the spirit who serves Prospero, is so nimble and agile that he moves gracefully across the stage to the extent that it is easy for the audience to believe that other than Prospero, the other characters on stage never see him.  He evokes sympathy from the audience because it is easy to see his goodness, thus the audience can silently root for his freedom from Prospero. Jesse Tyler Ferguson is exceptionally funny as the jester, Trinculo. His costume as well as the method in which he articulates language evokes playful laughter from the audience.

Sam Waterston as Prospero played his part well.  He appeared to have a cold because he coughed many times during the first hour.  He also had a large cup of liquid from which he periodically drank. His sipping from this kingly chalice was nicely woven into the story.  About one hour into the performance, he appeared to be feeling better. He was a prime example that “The show must go on.” The intensity of his emotions when talking to those he cares about most was shown. In the scene in which his daughter Miranda is going to marry Ferdinand, he strongly admonishes Ferdinand about not becoming intimate with his daughter before time. He warns Ferdinand sternly and as he delivers this speech, I chuckled because although he was serious, I could not help but chuckle because of the words themselves coupled with Waterston’s steadfastness. Moreover, as Prospero sets Ariel free at the end of the drama, Prospero’s desire to fulfill his own promise is evident and Ariel is set free.

Jesse Tyler Ferguson and Sam Waterston

This play is wonderfully engaging.  I will likely see it again this Saturday, June 6th. Do not delay.   The experience is worthwhile and how can you have a better experience under the stars- that is if there is not inclement weather. The next play after The Tempest at The Delacorte Theater is Cymbeline, one of Shakespeare’s lesser known works. It runs from July 23 to August 23, 2015.

Four ways to get tickets:

*Free distribution in Central Park at 12noon (line starts forming early before 6am.)

*Free virtual ticketing lottery (I’ve never been successful at getting tickets that way.) *

Free downtown lottery distribution at the Public Theater (I’ve never been successful with that either.)

*Skip the line and support free Shakespeare. ( for a sizable donation of $200 )

Personal Comment

Wendella Wilson and Me at The Delacorte Theater
Wendella Wilson and Me at The Delacorte Theater

On a personal note, I had the privilege of taking Wendella, one of my most brilliant students with exceptional character, to see The Tempest.  I had been asking students for a number of years to meet me at the Delacorte Theater during the summer so that they could learn to appreciate Shakespeare.  Recently, Wendella saw Jesse Tyler Ferguson on Jimmy Fallon speaking about his role in The Tempest. That ignited Wendella’s interest because she knew Ferguson from Modern Family. Additionally, this year because we had a large Shakespeare unit with a teaching artist, the students along with Wendella were able to perform scenes from Romeo and Juliet, thereby learning to appreciate Shakespeare in spite of its complexity. Furthermore, as a result of Wendella spreading the information about the show on Facebook, many other students are now looking forward to seeing live performances of Shakespearean works. For that reason alone, rising at 4am was worth it!

Deirdre M. DeLoatch
Deirdre M. DeLoatch

Comedic Romanticism in Shakespeare’s The Two Gentlemen of Verona

Chicago’s Fiasco Theater presents Shakespeare’s The Two Gentlemen of Verona, purportedly Shakespeare’s first play. It is presented at the Polonsky Theater at Theater for a New Audience. After seeing many Shakespearean tragedies over the last year, I looked forward to watching one of his comedies. I’ve read about twenty of Shakespeare’s plays, but I had no recollection of ever having read this play; however, I had seen it many years ago before this most recent performance. After hearing the audience member’s comment, it caused me to reflect on the expectations of theater. Admittedly, I like to be stimulated intellectually, but I also like to laugh. Laughter without stimulation causes both fatigue and boredom. I enjoyed a recent performance of Hamlet and A Winter’s Tale considerably more than The Two Gentlemen of Verona. Considering the script, this contemporary performance adds both another dimension and depth to the play via props, costumes, set design, and lighting that helps the audience view the play in a contemporary manner instead of fostering nostalgia for the Elizabethan era. (Please see morethantheplay.blogspot.com with Domenick Danza and I for further commentary on this play).

Shakespeare’s The Two Gentlemen of Verona, a romantic comedy, is the story of love, friendship, and betrayal. Valentine is in love with the lovely Silvia; his best friend from Childhood, Proteus, is in love with Julia. Proteus, upon meeting Silvia at the Duke’s Court immediately surreptitiously professes his love for her, although he heretofore professed his love for Julia. Proteus is aware that he is betraying his best friend but he decides to woo Silvia in spite of behaving duplicitously. Silvia, however, has been betrothed to Thurio, a suitor for whom she has no interest. Julia, disguises herself as a man, so that she can reunite with proteus. She eavesdrop on Proteus’s conversations to find out information about Proteus and Silvia. Valentine is banished by Silvia’s father, the Duke, preventing his love for Silvia from prospering. During his banishment, he continues to pine for Silvia, as Proteus desires to plot and scheme to get Silvia. In the end, Proteus and Julia salvage their relationship and profess their love; Similarly, Valentine and Silvia, with the blessing of her father, join together in love, as he realizes that Thurio does not have the depth of character as Valentine.

The set is not elaborate but its simplicity adds to its simple elegance. The set is designed using white crepe paper that appears to have flowers etched into some of the paper. The minimalist set is composed of two white tall pillars that have tree branches at the top of each pillar. There are two benches with a rustic flavor on each side of the stage that serves as seats for the actors when they are not featured in the scene. The floor of the stage is that of a beach boardwalk. At the ceiling of the stage, there is a net that holds the crepe paper. The crepe paper has a whimsical romantic feel as if one is in a country backyard, as if an outdoor wedding is imminent.

Regarding props, the red paper on which a letter is written is fabulous when it is torn to pieces.  It is as if Valentine’s heart is bleeding from over sentimentality. When each piece hits the stage it punctuates both the love that he is feeling and the hurt by his inability to consummate his relationship by marrying Sylvia.

The costumes are contemporary. The men wear Oxford shirts with Khaki pants. One of the characters wears suspenders. All of the men wear saddle shoes. Valentine wears a purple Oxford shirt and Proteus wears mauve Oxford shirt. The women have short flowing white or cream colored dresses with an eyelet design signaling romance and purity. The clothes transport me back to the eighties when the preppy clothing was in vogue.

Zachary  Fine and Emily Young
Zachary Fine and Emily Young

Secondly, this fine youthful ensemble cast adds to the success of the play. When one thinks of marriage, youthfulness is usually apparent. Many of the characters play multiple roles which allows us to see the professional skill of the actors playing varied and distinguished characters. Before the play starts, the cast is on stage jovially playing with each other and engaging in conversations about the lighting and how they will look on stage.  it is obvious that they all work well together. Zachary Fine plays both Valentine and the dog. His emotions are somewhat melodramatic especially when he is banished and he is not able to see his beloved Silvia.  That scene seems to be cloying with extreme sentimentality. The love that he has for her is affective to the extent that the audience feel his emotions which move us to empathy.  He is equally effective and affective as the dog which adds more comedy to the play and makes us all laugh. Emily Young is adorable. Her pulchritude is evident and  we can see why Valentine loves her and why Proteus has fallen for her as well.  She is lovely with her beautiful white dress (which is evident of her purity) and exquisite beauty. The deep love that both Valentine and Silvia have for each other is evident and can be seen through the great chemistry that is depicted throughout the play. The characters exhibit great emotion when their reflection, passion, and despair are all needed to match the events in the play. The scenes with the dog are highly chimerical and they add high comedy to the play. Even characters are seen laughing at well acted scenes. Jessie Austrian plays Julia well. When dressed as a man to conceal her identity, she plays the scene well with great verve. Noah Brody as Proteus illustrate the character well for we see how Proteus is a cad because he allows us to see his own reflective thoughts aptly about his dishonorable actions.

From left : Emily Young and Jessie Austrian
From left : Emily Young and Jessie Austrian

Although, this play is not my favorite and the story lacks both the power and intrigue of Shakespeare’s tragedies, the modernization of this rendition helps one place himself into the lives of the characters who are similar to youthful romantic couples of today. The acting is great and the whimsical nature of the performance allows the audience to both chuckle and smile and subsequently say, “bravo.” Thus, in spite of a nearby audience member’s exclamation, ” I had forgotten how dumb this play actually was,” I actually enjoyed it for the comedy in which it was intended.

I am looking forward to The Public Theater’s Performance of The Tempest and Cymbeline (I’ve neither read nor seen Cymbeline) at the Delacorte Theater in Central Park. I hope that they will be just as ebullient with vivacity as The Two Gentlemen of Verona.

Deirdre M. DeLoatch
Deirdre M. DeLoatch

For the Love of Shakespeare: Welcome to the Renaissance

https://i0.wp.com/www.nytix.com/repository/broadwayshows/2015/somethingrotten/something-rotten-large-643x441.jpg

Without planning and without hesitation, upon reading a preview of Something Rotten, a musical written by Karey and John O’Farrel, and both directed and choreographed by Casey Nicholaw, I rushed to the TKTS ticket booth to buy a ticket to the show.  This musical has a much accomplished creative team that will catapult this show to boffo box office sales. This show is pure entertainment. It is hilarious! It is stimulating! It is aesthetically gorgeous!  It had no tryout in London or in any other location. The Kirkpatrick brothers, having almost no theatrical experience believed that their show was going to be successful and opened on Broadway with stunning greatness. It’s that kind of confidence that is exuded in this performance.

“Welcome to the Renaissance,” the opening song of Something Rotten for both acts of the musical, sets the tone, at a high echelon, for the entire performance.  With this song comes great excitement, great energy and yes, great expectation (no pun intended). The minstrel and company arrive on the stage welcoming the audience to one of the greatest musicals in the last few years. It is an informal ode, filled with hilarity, to William Shakespeare, in spite of continuing controversy concerning his authorship of many of his greatest works. After they exit the stage, I was let down, albeit temporarily, because the opening act was difficult to rival and because it continued to echo in my head. After spending the last two months studying, teaching, and acting out scenes from Romeo and Juliet, and after watching a recent performance of Hamlet, it was natural to watch this spoof of Shakespeare’s greatest works, including the aforementioned plays as well as the recitation of his most famous sonnet.

This musical is about two brothers who are playwrights, but have difficulty getting employment as playwrights because of “The bard”, William Shakespeare.  As a result, Nick Bottom in desperation (Bottom was a character in A Midsummer’s Night Dream) consults an apothecary and seer, Nostradamus  (in real life Nostradamus was an apothecary with dubious prescience). As a result of pressure from Shylock, a money-lender (another Shakespeare reference) and Nostradamus’ prescience, Nick decides to do a musical, but his brother Nigel wants to be true to himself and wants to do something better.

This musical  has all of the elements of great theater: great musical score, superb costume and set design, unparalleled tap dancing and choreography, creative writing, compelling actors, a little romance (What is Shakespeare without two star crossed lovers?). Additionally, there are plenty of literary allusions. All the allusions make this a work of great erudition, but in a playful non didactic way. Although there are many lines taken from Shakespeare’s works and others have attempted works based on Shakespeare’s works, make no mistake, this is neither pastiche nor ersatz. In spite of this misappropriation from Shakespeare’s greatest works, it’s all done with both great antic and adroitness that all of the lines elicit chuckles and even appropriate guffaws. Some of the music is similar to musical selections from many Broadway musicals, but because of both the themes and content of the performance, the misappropriation is acceptable and adds to the hilarity. Others have attempted a similar work, but this musical out performs them all as result of a superb creative team that includes the director Casey Nicholaw from Aladdin and The Book of Mormon and Michael James Scott also from The Book of Mormon.

https://i0.wp.com/d3rm69wky8vagu.cloudfront.net/article-photos/large/1.172535.jpg
from left, Brian d’Arcy James, Christian Borle, and John Cariani

Something Rotten, opened on Broadway on April 22, 2015. Arguably,it  is the most well written musical to appear on Broadway since the arrival of the Book of Mormon, several years ago.  It may prove to be a juggernaut when the Tony nominations are announced on the 28th of April. The musical takes its title from Shakespeare’s Hamlet which has the famous line, “Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.” This music book is written by Karey Kirkpatrick and John O’Farrell and the music is written and composed by Kirkpatrick and his brother Karey Kirkpatrick, both musicians.  The musical stars Brian d’Arcy James and John Cariani as the Bottom brothers and Christian Borle as William Shakespeare.

Although this performance misappropriates lines and character names from some of Shakespeare’s greatest plays, as well as music, make no mistake, this is neither pastiche nor ersatz. Although there have been productions that have attempted a similar work, this performance has such well written songs (many with familiar tunes), well written dialogue, tap dancing, and superb actors with great verve that one never loses focus while watching this musical.  It is somewhat, however, highbrow with the creative writing, but one may never realize it. The audience member has to be well versed in Shakespeare’s famous sonnet, in Hamlet, in Romeo and Juliet, in The Merchant of Venice, and in Richard II. Having some knowledge of the controversy behind some of Shakespeare’s works also helps.  Moreover, having knowledge of the Renaissance would also add a greater dept to the understanding of the musical. If one is a musical buff and has seen musicals such as A Chorus Line, Dream Girls, Les Miserables, Cats, and has even the NYC Rockettes, then he or she is likely to have a greater appreciation of Something Rotten. If prior knowledge of musicals and Shakespeare is lacking, then the audience member will not understand the greatness of this musical. He or she will enjoy it, while never appreciating the brilliance of the writing. At the end of the show, I wanted to break out into Lionel Richie’s song, “All Night Long. and sing the lines “Let the music play on play on, everybody sing and everybody dance…” in tribute to the extraordinary music selections in the show.

Superb acting also helps make this show supreme among recent musicals. The Minstrel (a medieval singer of lyrical poetry) is played by Michael James Scott, from the The Book of Mormon and more recently as understudy for the genie in Broadway’s Aladdin. He sings and dances with great ebullience, that I almost felt like joining in with him. The song lasts for a number of minutes.  When it was over, I really wanted him and the ensemble to sing the song again.  Luckily, at the beginning of Act II, they reprise the song, although somewhat abbreviated. Scott sings and dances as part of the ensemble throughout the performance. His enthusiasm for the show is evident through his countenance. He seems to be the life of the musical. Shakespeare, played by Christian Borle’s,  walks on stage with great swagger and in garb reminiscent of Shakespeare. He looks just like the famous picture that many of us have seen of Shakespeare. He exudes confidence and ingenuity while acting this role. Every time Borle  arrives on stage and engages in duplicity and in artifice, his acting is near flawless. Brian d’ Arcy James and John Cariani deliver their lines well, but it is Borle and Scott who are supreme in this show.  Borle’s acting and Scott’s singing and dancing are what theater should be- engaging and compelling.

https://i0.wp.com/lang.presstelegram.com/projects/historic/images/styles/tudor-250px.jpg
Tudor home The set was designed to look like Tudor homes, reminiscent of Tudor era from 1485-1603.

The set design includes Tudor homes, (reminiscent of sixteenth century England) with thatched roofs and a theater with a proscenium arch.The original Globe Theater had a thatched roof which was the cause of the theater burning entirely. When the characters performed “omelette”, a parody of the real Hamlet, the new set design of a theater would come down from the top of the stage, mimicking a real theater. The set also includes a courtroom scene, that mimics courtrooms during the Elizabethan era .

Elizabethan costumes in the musical provide information about the status of the person wearing them.  The show is set in the 1590’s, toward the end of Queen Elizabeth I’s reign. The fabrics that the characters wear are dictated by society. The women’s costumes feature bumrolls, petticoats, and long sleeves. The costumes of the Christian characters in the musical wear are puritanical in nature to reflect their austere nature. The costumes add authenticity.https://i0.wp.com/images.renaissancecostumesclothing.com/products/3785/1-2/elizabethan-costume.jpg

For those of you who are Shakespeare aficionados or Shakespeare enthusiasts, this show is a must see. Do not delay.  Get your tickets today. The Tony award nominations are forthcoming.  I predict that Something Rotten will receive nominations for best musical, best book of a musical, best original score, best choreography, best director, best performance by a featured actor in a musical (Scott) and maybe best actor (Borle). Do not pass this by! A review of Hamlet, one of Shakespeare’s greatest masterpieces, is forthcoming.

Deirdre M. DeLoatch
Deirdre M. DeLoatch

Wolf Hall: From Novel to Stage

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CCLrQoBWMAAcDYp.jpg:large
Similar to the seventies Heinz Ketchup commercial that said “Anticipation is making me wait,” the stage adaptation for Hilary Mantel’s Wolf Hall for months was making me wait.  For many months, I had eagerly awaited the stage productions at the Winter Garden Theater of Mantel’s novels, Wolf Hall and Bring up the Bodies, its sequel.  When I visited London a couple of months ago, I wanted to see the Royal Shakespeare Company, but because of travel time to Stratford, I decided to forgo the trip.  I was familiar with their work as a result of seeing them, in collaboration with another theater company, perform Shakespeare’s Anthony and Cleopatra last year. When I read about their pending repertory performance on Broadway, I knew that the quality of the performance would be extraordinary. I became so excited about the upcoming performance because I love classical historical drama and because all the shows that I have seen in London have been either captivating or riveting. I expected no less from the Royal Shakespeare Company’s production of Wolf Hall. Last week before seeing the stage adaptation of Wolf Hall, I decided to read the novel’s first two parts twice to gain a better understanding of all the characters in the story.  Without having a working knowledge of the history, keeping track of all of the characters was proving to be difficult. Upon reading it the second time, the characters became less obscure and much clearer. After reading parts one and two of the novel, Wolf Hall, I watched the first episode of Wolf Hall on PBS.  As a result, I became even more enamored with the text.  I was so enthralled that I googled many of the major players of this historic drama.  I wanted to ensure that I had an accurate understanding of the major historical people and events discussed.  Mantel, in many respects, keeps well in tune with the actual historical events of the life of Henry VIII; however, she refashions Thomas Cromwell to make him much more palatable than the version depicted in A Man For All Seasons (I read that in high school), allowing us to focus less on his malfeasance and more on his fidelity to the King and to Cardinal Wolsey.https://i0.wp.com/www.rsc.org.uk/images/content/wolf-hall-parts-i-and-ii.jpg

Hillary Mantel’s novel in two parts tells the story of how Henry VIII requested annulments from both Catherine of Aragon and Anne Boleyn because they were not able to give him a son as heir to the British throne. To help one understand the historical aspect of the story, Henry VIII married Katherine who was his brother’s widow.  He claimed that his brother never consummated his marriage and that his brother never touched Katherine, therefore he was free to marry her.  But after eighteen years of marriage, she failed to give him a son that would be heir to the throne.  As a result, he petitioned the Pope, via Cardinal Wolsey, for an annulment.  The pope refused over the protestations of Henry VIII. He married Anne Boleyn anyway and later had her executed for adultery, incest, and treason (she failed to produce a son).  Thomas Cromwell was his “right hand man” who helped the King accomplish his goals of annulment and subsequent marriages, all the while the King never achieved his primary of goal of having a male heir to the throne!  Little did he know that he was to blame!!

The novel was adapted for the stage by Mike Poulton.  Make no mistake, this play focuses on Thomas Cromwell and his relationship to Henry VIII and to Cardinal Wolsey. The other characters are essential, but the play gives great insight into Cromwell’s actions in relation to the Catholic Church and in relation to those around him. The play had its original runs in Stratford preceding its run on the West End in London before coming to Broadway. Ben Miles plays loyal Thomas Cromwell, a lawyer, Nathaniel Parker plays King Henry VIII, and Lydia Leonard plays the fearless and shrewd Anne Boleyn, who is later convicted  and subsequently beheaded for treason, incest, and adultery –  charges that are historically thought to be false. I saw each part of the play on separate days. The theater appeared to be sold out for the first part, but was only half full for the second part.  Even though the first part ended superbly with the foreshadowing of Jane Seymour, I surmise that either the length of the play or the subject matter deterred people from watching the second part.  The running time for each part is about two hours and forty-five minutes. Additionally, if one does not know the story of Henry VIII, he or she might have become confused by the twenty-four major characters and by about another twenty minor characters. As a result of reading the novel and watching the PBS Masterpiece series, I understood the content of the play. My suggestion for those who are seeking to see the play is to research some basic history of Henry VIII, Thomas Cromwell, Cardinal Wolsey, Anne Boleyn, Catherine of Aragon, and Jane Seymour. If one knows the key aspects of their lives as they relate to the British monarchy, understanding the play will not be as arduous. If one takes some time to research the history, then disappointment will be unlikely for the acting is superb and the writing keeps one engaged all the while already knowing how the drama is going to unfold and end. Even though I knew the ending, I remained riveted by the story and it maintained my engagement. Lydia Leonard was outstanding in her portrayal of Anne Boleyn. One should see the play for her dramatic portrayal.  Her performance will leave the average theatergoer wanting more from her, yet knowing that the story ends with Jane Seymour, the subsequent wife of the King after Boleyn. Don’t be dismayed, rumor has it that part three of this novel is coming! Maybe a drama will follow.

As a result of my prior knowledge of the novel and of British history, I recognized the action and many of the lines of dialogue in the play that were taken directly from the novel. For example, Cromwell discusses that in the Bible there is no mention of purgatory, no pope, no relics, etc.  He also discusses, William Tyndale, a leader in the Protestant Reformation. These references in the play are used as a basis for King Henry VIII forming the Church of England. Because of the enormity of Wolf Hall– nearly six hundred pages, the stage adaptation has only the most salient points of the novel and of British monarchy history.  Without starting from the beginning of the novel, which details Cromwell’s humble beginnings, the play periodically hints at Cromwell’s beginnings as the son of a blacksmith. The stage adaptation does detail, as the story progresses, the deaths of Cromwell’s wife and daughters from sweating sickness as well as the life of his only son. The sentiments of each of the major characters are accurately portrayed.  One can see that Anne Boleyn’s shrewdness is depicted accurately as well as the coy and subtle coquettish behavior of Jane Seymour, Henry VIII’s third wife. The great adaptation allows us to follow the trajectory of both Cromwell’s life as well as Henry’s VIII’s life and his wives.

https://i0.wp.com/static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2014/5/16/1400241645563/Ben-Miles-Thomas-Cromwell-003.jpg
Ben Miles and Lydia Leonard playing Thomas Cromwell and Anne Boleyn

Creatively this dramatic rendering does much with less. The set design features high cement towers that serves many purposes.  The lighting design and sound designed helps the audience to determine the actual location of each scene.  At times, the play is set on the Thames River. The sound of the water as the characters are on the boat gives a strong sense of location.  Other times, the characters are indoors and there is often a fireplace that gives us understanding of the location. The scenes at the Tower of London where Anne Boleyn and others were beheaded is dark and has a sinister atmosphere.The creative team does a splendid performance in its decisions of costume design. The costumes in the play are reminiscent of both the fifteenth and the sixteenth century. The costumes help one to be able to distinguish the characters from each other. Their power and their wealth were both displayed through their clothing. During sixteenth century England, velvet, wool and silk became sought after fabrics. The play’s costume fabrics are elegant and display the opulence of the monarchy. The hats that they wear also depict the era.

Although this play does not have many special effects, its strength lies in the writing and in the acting that are used to maintain your interest. Sometimes, plays use many techniques to either make a production greater or to mask otherwise weak productions; but, this production is great at its core without all the possible technology and elaborate set design. It’s set in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, a time when all of the advances were not on the horizon. There are no anachronisms that are out of tune with the setting of this historical drama. Perhaps in the future, we will see more dramas like this.

Please get your tickets to Wolf Hall– both parts!  This is a limited run of fifteen weeks. Even if you believe that the play will be difficult, watching this historical drama will not likely leave you disappointed.  You will be both engrossed and educated at the same time. Why not give it a try! As I finish this post, the PBS drama awaits me! Yes, I still want to watch the drama unfold, even though I know the entire story.  The reviews for that series have been on par with Downton Abbey. What can I say? I love both great writing and great theater.

Starting in July, Lin Manuel Miranda’s Hamilton, a historical musical, will be appearing on Broadway after a successful run at the Public Theater in New York City.  I was dilatory in getting a ticket and I have had no success at the Public’s ticket lottery.  I hope to get a ticket for this upcoming Broadway production. I’m expecting it to be as great as Wolf Hall. Reputation is everything! Comments welcome.

Deirdre M. DeLoatch
Deirdre M. DeLoatch

Josephine Baker: A One Woman Show

https://i0.wp.com/www.publictheater.org/PageFiles/9382/JI_370x238.jpg

On a recent Friday night at Joe’s Pub (restaurant and performing arts venue at the Public Theater), while waiting for Josephine and I to begin, I have slight trepidation about the performance I am expecting to see. I am wondering if the artist playing Josephine Baker is either going to appear on stage with a skirt made of bananas or whether any of the costumes worn will be risqué.(The banana skirt was one of Baker’s most controversial costumes). I hold my breath and say, “I hope not.” I, along with many others wait for the show to start. We see what appears to be a stage worker, whisper to the pianist who is playing a nice cabaret style composition. The pianist then plays the composition again and again and again. Apparently the pianist is told that the performer is going to be late. My table mates and I whisper, “where is she?” Then, the performer, Cush Jumbo, rushes onto the stage with coat on and bags in hand, offering up apologies for her dilatoriness. She says she just came from an audition that was for a great show about which she cannot tell us. She takes her coat off says a few words of explanation about artists’ lives and then flawlessly becomes Josephine Baker. At that moment, I ask myself, if the previous routine is part of the show. Yes it is! Her acting is sheer perfection. Thus, begins the show, Josephine and I! For the record, Jumbo never puts on the banana skirt! It is only discretely mentioned during the performance. There is nothing off kilter about this performance. For those who are not familiar with Josephine Baker, the show offers up a cultural history that is worth watching. Within five minutes of the show, I realize that I am about to see a splendiferous performance with both great originality and flavor.

https://i0.wp.com/ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV5BMjA2NDYwNjQwNF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwODAzNTY2MDE%40._V1_SX214_CR0%2C0%2C214%2C317_AL_.jpg

During the month of March until April 5th, Cush Jumbo (also the playwright) performs this show at The Public Theater in NYC. She is supported by an award winning creative team. The show is directed by Phyllida Lloyd and Anthony Ward is the scenic and costume designer; Joseph Atkins is the music director. This solo show was first performed at The Bush Theater during the 2013 season. Recently, Jumbo appeared on Broadway, alongside Hugh Jackman, in The River.

When Jumbo was younger she came across Baker and marveled at her success and how Baker resembled her in color. Jumbo, a fair woman of color, decided to research the life of Baker. She became intrigued with her life and how she navigated the waters of racial hostility in America.

Jumbo’s one woman show is a success.  She captivates and at times rivets the audience during the scenes that explore the complexity of some of the unpopular decisions that Baker made as well as how the NAACP supported her and how and she handled the racism of the time during her career in the United States. Jumbo shows the transition that Baker made when she adopted France as her new homeland, a practice common to black artists of that era. She makes some parallels between her life and that of Baker’s.

To add historical accuracy, Jumbo uses mixed media to convey the sentiment of the time regarding Baker’s career while Jumbo depicts her own professional career. Through these real life recordings, we are catapulted to the time period with great historical accuracy and specificity. Additionally, through video projected newspaper clippings, and exquisite acting, we experience verisimilitude, a technique that makes the performance engaging. We experience Baker as a blacklisted artist. The mixed media allows the audience to feel the hostility that Baker faced as an artist in America.

Through music, dance, and storytelling Jumbo superbly offers up a great rendition of Baker’s life while gently weaving in details of the challenges that she and Baker both faced as artists. She explores how artists engage in actions that others do not understand. They take roles that are not considered kosher so that they can further their careers.  Moreover, she infuses these ideas not to change your mind about Baker’s actions, but to give insight into the decision making that actors face especially when confronting bias. When Jumbo transitions from Baker’s life to that of her own, at first, it seems like an unwanted interruption, but the acting is perfect and the audience is allowed to see the connection between both artists’ lives. One of the transitions appeared to be longer than I would have liked, but she superbly acted the scene; thus, it is easy to forgive the intrusion of the lengthiness of her own story. She tells these stories with both great dance and music to the extent that the transitions overall are well done and do not detract from Baker’s story. Jumbo apparently studied Baker’s dance choreography and is able to replicate some of the dance movements.

https://www.bushtheatre.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/20130715-125237.820_105-2000x1428.jpg
Performed previously at The Bush Theater

Anthony Ward, the costume designer, is a Tony Award winning theatrical set designer. The costume design, filled with both glitz and glamour, was fabulous. The costume changes were seamless. Often through the show, Jumbo puts on and takes off various costumes to reflect the different performances in which Baker engaged. She often took off parts of a dress or skirt while putting on other parts to make the outfit slightly different.

Jumbo makes maximum use of her audience to maintain engagement. Throughout the entire performance, Jumbo makes us feel part of the show. During one of the scenes she talks to an audience member, but it is actually part of the script. Additionally, to maximize audience engagement, tables are used to maximum effect. We were asked to light candles during one of the scenes. Moreover, in the theatrical space, there are dolls representing the many children of various races, religions, and ethnicities that Baker adopted. These dolls are placed strategically throughout the room. Jumbo then continues her performance as she walks about the room performing her routine as she infuses the issue of race, via the dolls, as neither an essential nor preponderant quality necessary for both love and acceptance.https://rebeccamcwattie.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/josephine-baker-funral-2.jpg

Near the end of the performance, Jumbo effortlessly reenacts Baker’s last performance in Paris at the Bobino. It was a sold out crowd. Baker, in Paris, had not performed for a period of time due to illness. It was a celebration of her fifty year career as an entertainer. Baker, via Jumbo, gets back on stage and gives what became her final performance to great reviews.  Jumbo ends the show showing how Baker spent her final lucid moments before suffering a cerebral hemorrhage which ultimately resulted in her premature death. She was reading the reviews of her show in the newspapers – a regular custom which she practiced.

https://i0.wp.com/www.doctormacro.com/Images/Baker%2C%20Josephine/Baker%2C%20Josephine_01C.jpg
Josephine Baker in all her glory and splendor

Jumbo maintains historical accuracy that is not overly didactic, but entertaining. I left feeling excited and thoroughly entertained. using ideas from the film, Seymour: An Introduction, it is both the dissonance and the harmony of life that allow us to play life beautifully. Jumbo’s spirit embodied it. I say to her and others like her, play on! Through music, dance, and storytelling we get a beautiful glimpse into the artistry of Josephine Baker. The fortieth anniversary of Baker’s death is April 12th. Why not celebrate it by attending the show or by reading about Baker’s life? The tickets are reasonably priced and $20 rush tickets are available the day of the performance. It’s at Joe’s Pub at The Public Theater. Have a good dinner or lunch with entertainment! Performances continue until April 5th. If you cannot see it then, it will appear at Steppenwolf Theater in Chicago after its run at The Public Theater. Comments welcome!

Deirdre M. DeLoatch
Deirdre M. DeLoatch, blogger

Shakespeare in the 18th Century: A Magnificent Blend

The Royal Shakespeare Company and Miami’s GableStage via New York City’s Public Theater, have done the impossible in juxtaposing two important pages of history. In their desire to bring the original Shakespearean tragedy, Antony and Cleopatra to a new era, these two companies went to the 18th  century at a time in which prejudice and racial discrimination ravaged the Caribbean.  The play, wonderfully directed by Tarell Alvin McCraney, stars Jonathan Cake as Mark Antony, Charise Castro Smith as Octavia, Samuel Collings as Octavius Ceasar and  Joaquina Kalukango as Cleopatra, and a cast of other talented actors.  To entertain and to introduce the audience to the music that is infused in the play, there are exemplary musicians who play folklore, traditional Haitian music, before the play begins.  The well-known story of Antony and Cleopatra brings tears to many theater goers’ eyes, and has taken passionate love to another dimension when the companies  in a parallel attempt move back and forth  from the Roman Empire to the Haitian Revolution against France in the late 18th century.
As the story unfolds people familiar with global history relive the poignant and passionate love story of the Egyptian Queen Cleopatra who is madly in love with Marcus Antonius (known as Mark Antony).   After the breakage of the triumvirate, war was inevitable between Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus (Octavius) and Anthony. The ill-fated love so characteristic of Shakespearean theater culminates with the suicidal and tragic death of the two lovers.  It is truly a poignant and breathtaking story! How then can one take such a tragic story and bring it to the twenty-first Century? To immortalize true love and bring it to the level of a ‘Paul and Virginia’ or a ‘Romeo and Juliet’, the producers went into the Haitian folklore and found ways to deify the slave woman with songs like Choukoune, Ti zwazo, and Dèy before offering them in holocaust on the altar of veritable but impossible love.  To uncover the plot that leads to the death of a white colonialist and his colored mistress, Anthony becomes a French general obligated to return to France, and Cleopatra becomes the: ‘Choukoune ak je li clere kou yon chandèl’ (A woman with eyes shining brighter than a star), and the mourning woman desperately awaiting the return of her lover.  The infusion of both stories makes for a brilliant recounting of this familiar love story, despite some historical inconsistencies that Shakespeare fashions in his recounting of an Egyptian and Roman tragic love story.
The relationship between Octavius, Mark Antony, and Cleopatra is complicated, but we can look to history for clarity and understanding.  Julius Caesar had a relationship with Cleopatra, but after his death, Mark Anthony had an affair with her while he was married to Fluvia, his current wife, who later died.  Upon Julius Caesar’s death, the throne was given to his son Octavius. Octavius may not have thought well of Cleopatra because of her affairs with both Antony and Julius Caesar. Cleopatra’s relationship with Julius Caesar may have been a political move for her to secure her throne against the Roman Empire.  Cleopatra may have served her own interests in her love relationships.  Furthermore, according to Adrian Goldsworthy in his historical biography, Antony and Cleopatra, “There is no actual evidence to suggest that her concerns went any further than enduring a steady flow of taxation into her own hands, to cement her hold on power.”  According to history, Cleopatra was well educated and cagey.  She used her perspicacity shrewdly to cement her place in history. Additionally, Shakespeare’s tragedy portrays Octavius as a ruthless, cold-hearted ruler and Antony as a simple-easy minded soldier has very little veracity; these depictions appear to be merely fooder for good story telling.
In Shakespeare’s rendition of this tragedy, there is great tension between Octavius and Antony and Antony and Cleopatra.  To forge a strong military relationship between Antony and Octavius, Octavius offers his sister, Octavia, in marriage to Antony; however, this friendship is ephemeral and the marriage is duplicitous.   This marriage is the basis for the conflict between Antony and Cleopatra and the continued affair with Cleopatra is the basis for the erosion of Antony’s relationship with Octavius. Antony and Cleopatra make themselves both king and Queen of Alexandria further angering Octavius.  Antony also walks away from a battle to follow Cleopatra. Through mendacity and beguilement, misinformation is given to Antony, ultimately causing a macabre scene. At the end, there is great distrust and misunderstanding by the major characters, resulting in the deaths of both Antony and Cleopatra.
The acting, set design, and costume design help captivate the audience when watching an otherwise difficult Shakespearean tragedy. The powerful emotion the characters display helps to understand the dynamics among the characters. A pool of water was strategically placed at the back of the stage and cleverly used in several battles at sea. The characters wore either stolas ( worn by Roman and Egyptian women ) or togas worn by Roman men to represent the attire of both Rome and Egypt during that era.
Familiarizing oneself with the story including its historical aspects may be necessary to gain a greater understanding of the play.  Otherwise, one may find himself exiting the theater during intermission.  Shakespeare is difficult.  The vocabulary is bombastic, but the music, the passion, and the great acting can assist in overcoming these challenges. I may see it a second time for further enlightenment of this historical drama. There is no shame in admitting that the play is intellectually challenging; the shame is in doing nothing about it.
Comments are welcome.

Review of Claire by the Sea Light

Claire by the Sea Light, by Edwidge Danticat is a lyrically  descriptive novel that intricately weaves seemingly unrelated characters and stories with each other.  Danticat is a Haitian American writer who sets her novels in Haiti, the poorest country in the Western Hemiphere that has seen its share of atrocities and disastrous natural events.  The story begins with Claire of the Sea Light, a seven year old girl whose mother passed during the childbirth of Claire.  Her father has raised her in spite of the difficulties because of the loss of maternal care.  He often tries to have maternal influence and connections with the mother’s family; however, Claire realizes that these visits are insufficient.  Her father decides that he needs to have someone “adopt” her so that she can have a better life.  At the point of transfer, Claire mysteriously disappears at first thought into the sea.  The next vignettes weave connections of different characters and their relation to each other. Most of the vignettes are macabre like, bordering on the French genre, danse macabre, which horrifically weaves stories of death with a central theme between each story. Beautifully, yet tragically told, the novel ends with a hint of optimism and ends with courage that the characters can face life’s disappointments and its challenges.

After the disappearance of Claire, the narrator details the connection of Madame Gaelle Lavaud, the woman who was to adopt Claire, with both Claire and her father Nozias. Madame Gaelle is pregnant with a baby that is not expected to live.  Her doctor tells her that her baby is going to be still born. As the chapter progresses, one believes that the baby will die; but, with tragic irony, Gaelle’s husband, Laurent Lavaud, is shot and killed.  According to the narrator, “The shots had rung out as Laurent was leaving the station, and he was struck by three bullets to the heart and died on the spot.” Madame Gaelle’s connection to Claire ‘s story is that at the point of Claire’s mother’s death, Madame Gaelle became the wet nurse for Claire.  Madame knew Claire’s mother briefly, not intimately.  In spite of their lack of closeness, Madame is responsible for Claire’s viability.  Gaelle gives Claire life in spite of  the enormity of the constant grief that she suffers as a result of the death of her husband.  To connect the relation of the characters,  the novel opens in the first few vignettes with a recantation of Claire’s mother’s death, with both the disappearance and assumed death of Claire, and with the brutal death of  Laurent Lavaud, Gaelle’s husband.

Similarly, we encounter in the next vignette, Bernard Dorien who is tragically killed in a gang assault. The narrator tells us that “Bernard Dorien was found dead in the bed of his bedroom.  He is murdered in the same way that Laurent Lavaud, the owner of the fabric shop had, with three bullets expertly, and, in Bernard’s case, silently, administered to the heart.” Gangs have invaded Ville Rose, the community in which this novel is set.  Dorien, has a friend, Max Ardin Jr, who moves away before Dorien’s death.  Danticat surreptitiously and creatively exposes the connection of these characters with others in the novel.   Much later in the novel, Danticat intricately connects Claire with Max Ardin Jr, and explains the relation of Ardin with Bernard and the reason for his sudden departure.

Throughout the next series of vignettes, Danticat exposes the foibles and vices of other characters.  We see that husbands are having covert affairs and some affairs that appear to be less covert.  We see that Max Ardin Jr, has raped a worker in his parent’s home.  His rape is exposed in a dramatic radio program as the woman in which Ardin is covertly seeing seeks revenge for an indignity that she believes she has suffered. Both Ardin Senior and Junior suffer a public humiliation as a result of their stealth actions that have now been exposed.  Max Jr fathers a child as a result of rape.  The narrator also touches upon the gay relationship that Ardin had with Bernard Dorien.  His father tries to cover the rape.  He is distraught because he is prohibited from becoming a father to his child.  He cannot face the public humiliation and he desires to commit suicide.  He goes out to sea and nearly drowns.  He is rescued by Madame Gaelle and by Nozias who have spent time looking for Claire, who has disappeared possibly into the sea.

Lastly, Claire goes to a place, ” Inutile” defined in English as useless ; however, it becomes useful to Claire because she retreats to the top of Inutile where she is able to process the burgeoning new life that she can have with Madame Gaelle.  If she takes her life, she wonders whether she will be missed.  She realizes that her sorrow can be turned into hope.  She sings a song with the lyrics, “She has to go home/To see the man/ Who’d crawled half dead/Out of the sea.”  Through CPR, life is pumped back into Max Ardin Jr.  Concurrently, life is pumped back into Claire of the Sea Light.  At that point she grows into her name and just may possibly be the person who becomes the light to others through the offer of hope.

Through this beautifully crafted story one can see the interconnectedness of life.  One event impacts the other just as we impact the lives, positively and negatively, of each other.  Although this novel first appears to be about death, it is about how the characters are given a new chance at life in place of sorrow.  One cannot help but hope that that same hope can be transferred to Haiti in spite of its gang violence and its random deaths.